Center for Security Research Research The cubs of the Caliphate: challenge vs threat

The cubs of the Caliphate: challenge vs threat

Rabie W. Sedrak


The Cubs of the Caliphate are the children who were exploited by ISIS during the armed conflicts in its quasi-state within Iraq and Syria. Created to serve one purpose, which is to ensure the continuity of the Caliphate and to convey ISIS ideology and message to future generations all over the world. Even though the Islamic State was militarily defeated, the number of children indoctrinated by the Islamic State’s ideology is still increasing, and if not treated properly, those children will represent a threat to world peace and security.

Returning foreign terrorist fighters (RFTF) experience in Europe and particularly in Balkans is very unique since the involvement of adult fighters with ISIS was a voluntary-based involvement and not a recruitment-based one. Despite the global interest in fighting violent extremism in the past two decades, only few efforts focused on the deradicalization process itself. Ultimately, the available reintegration programs are likely to be inadequate for those children since they were originally developed to address adult soldiers and not minors.

This document defines the Cubs of the Caliphate, their role, their purpose, and their long-term impact on European and global security. The purpose of this document is to present the three possible scenarios awaiting RFTF and their family members, as well to suggest recommendations based on the analysis of different case studies from the Middle East.

A Perpetual Impact

A research published by ICPVTR[1], indicates that ISIS has a multigenerational vision when it comes to recruiting and indoctrinating children and the consequences of such vision will probably develop a multigeneration impact. The legacy of war and its psychological aftermath will continue to shape the lives of children who were recruited by the Islamic State for a very long time.

This means that children who have participated in violence during armed conflict tend to suffer from psychological illnesses, while their continuous exposure to violence could possibly lead to the steady incorporation of violence as a criterion – when the exception becomes a rule.

When ISIS was defeated and amid their withdrawal, thousands of children were left behind. Those children who were exposed to wars and armed conflicts, and were indoctrinated with such extreme ideologies, once disarmed, and demobilized, they will definitely become a challenge to peace and security. The integrated radical thoughts and extreme beliefs in those children’s brain are heavily rooted. Such doctrine was developed specifically to be conveyed to their entire generation and consequently to the entire region.

According to ICPVTR, the participation of children in Islamic State provokes a recurring pattern of violence that is likely to persist at three levels:

  • Children involved in violence are likely to fall back towards the same.
  • Children will continue to represent and fight for Islamic State due to ISIS systemic indoctrination.
  • The present generation of children will act as a catalyst for the mobilization and recruitment of subsequent generations.

To attain a successful reintegration and rehabilitation process, relevant institutions should focus on developing tailor-made DDRR[2] programs (disarmament, demobilization, reintegration, and rehabilitation). It is true that the participation of children in violent actions violates conventional war conduct; however, child soldiers always remain neglected during the post-conflict restructuration stage after cessation of hostilities.

In a nutshell, physical, psychological, and social needs of children who were indoctrinated by the Islamic State or by similar ideologies, must be an essential part of any DDRR program or similar reintegration programs. Providing educational training for children who have missed proper schooling while being a part of the Islamic State, will definitely establish social and economic alternatives to being a member of a terrorist organization.

Three Possible Scenarios

Between the walls of correction facilities and the remaining refugee’s camps in Iraq and Syria, thousands of orphan ISIS children are awaiting an unknown fate, whom parents have died in combat or fled to other countries. And amid tight security, they are being transported across the borders of Syria and Iraq back to their countries of origin. The return of those cubs to their home countries is still a big challenge facing the international community especially EU and Balkan countries, since most of them are still minors.

The return of those children back to EU and Balkan countries, did not end the crisis. On the opposite, their return created a new challenge yet to be faced by those countries’ governments, which is achieving a psychological balance through rehabilitation. We are not here today to address or discuss statistics and number, but to face the fact that quite a large number of such indoctrinated children are actually living among us in Europe, regardless of whether they took part of some armed conflicts abroad or not. EU and Balkan countries have the full responsibility to take serious steps towards rehabilitating those children, otherwise the question remains, what will be the fate of those children in Europe if no action is taken?

Here we are looking at three possible scenarios: Reintegration, Imprisonment and Taking no action.

Rehabilitation and Reintegration

The first scenario is to reintegrate those children back into their societies. However, this step must be preceded by a phase of psychological, educational, and societal rehabilitation; considering that those children used to live in very exceptional circumstances throughout wars and beyond.

Considering the challenges facing the reintegration scenario, we need to point out that the rehabilitation phase, to achieve a psychological balance for those children and reintegrate them back into their local communities requires a very long time maybe even years, since the purpose here is to get rid of all the negative effects and potential extremist ideas that were established in the minds of those young people.

Rehabilitation per se is not an impossible task, but rather requires very specific and dedicated treatment programs, adequate budgets, and special facilities, in addition to specialists in psychiatry and social care, time, and huge effort related to the cooperation and the orchestration between relevant institutions involved in the process. We have to note that the state capability to confront the ideology of terrorist organizations – resources and its ability to keep up and stay updated – time, are the two major elements to reintegrate the children of the Islamic State.

Few European countries, as well Canada and Australia have succeeded in absorbing those children upon their return, taking important steps towards a psychological, health and social rehabilitation, reintegration courses, and dialogue sessions between specialists and victims of such terrorist organization. Such practices emphasize the significance of a serious and a thoughtful interaction with those children.


Field reports indicate that the majority of Islamic State children are coming from Eastern European countries as well from Germany and Turkey. The Central Criminal Court in Baghdad is one of the main institutions that is responsible for deporting those children back to their countries of origin. Some of those countries have disclaimed the responsibility to receive them, while other countries have agreed and started the procedures for their return and for their rehabilitation process.

Regarding the imprisonment, we are all aware that prison would not be the most adequate place for ISIS children, and it is far from being a practical solution to reduce their future potential risk. Such scenario of “throwing them in the hole” will probably result in an opposite outcome, it will rather facilitate for those children to become preys to the same terrorist organizations or to extreme individuals currently in prison.

On the legislative side, relevant institutions must understand that tightening laws against ISIS children and punishing them with imprisonment can only cause irreversible damages. Given the fact that children at such a young age, need a rebuilding for their mind and perception, as well to erase the negative influence of the ISIS phase, the post-ISIS phase, and the loss of their families; rather than punishing them for something they did not do, or maybe for something they did under coercion or while they weren’t aware of.

Taking No Action

The most alarming action that EU countries and the international community can take, is to leave ISIS children without any rehabilitation or reintegration process. Unfortunately, this is the scenario I am expecting for those children upon returning to their home countries, and this is exactly what the Islamic State is expecting us to do and even wishing for it. Such approach will only facilitate the reproduction of new extremists who believe only in violence and in taking up arms and fighting against the members of their own communities.

Many experiences in the past have underestimated the return of Islamic State children and their families, which led to the creation of new generations of extremists that until today the world is suffering from their actions. One of those experiences was the return of the first generations of Al-Qaeda fighters to their home countries, which resulted in the emergence of Bin-Laden who became later the leader of the same organization, such families like Bin-Laden’ s, were left without rehabilitation which made it easy for extremist ideologies to spread down the line through younger generations.

Iraq announced that there are more than 1,000 foreign children of ISIS-affiliated parents on its territory, where most of them are held inside detention centers and were left without their families in Iraq after the defeat of the organization in 2017. Between the harsh living conditions and an uncertain future, Islamic State children remain as the organization’s most affected victims by its terrorism in Iraq and Syria over the past 7 years.


Islamic State children do not know what a normal life is, they grew up in a different society and they have been through extreme physical and psychological sufferings. The reintegration of those children will be a very hard task to achieve. One of the factors that will determine the proper methodology for the reintegration of those children is to study whether they have chosen willingly to join the Islamic State, or they were forced by their parents to join – “victims vs radicals”. In other words, to learn whether if the ISIS brainwash process already took place and to which extent, or they were just at the wrong time in the wrong place.

In order to answer such question, an inclusive analysis should be made to determine the nature of their involvement with such terrorist groups as well their tendency to join similar groups in the future after being reintegrated! Relevant institutions involved in this process, must focus on the environment surrounding those children, such as school, friends, and the society as a whole. Engaging their surrounding environment in the reintegration process, will play a major role in the prevention of radicalization of those children by raising the public awareness, facing, and talking about the problem rather than running away from it.

Different study cases suggest that the reintegration approach must be on a case-to-case basis, reintegration programs must be designed according to every individual and/or group of individuals; regardless of whether those children will be submitted to court proceedings or not before going through such programs.

RFTF experience in Europe and particularly in the Balkans is different, since the involvement of the adult fighters with those terrorist groups was a voluntary-based involvement and not a recruitment-based one. Thus, reintegrating their children will be a long hard task, and finding them will be even harder. There are thousands of children that are being held in those detention facilities, and with the lack of resources and proper reintegration methods and approaches, those children will risk being left without rehabilitation and as I mentioned earlier, that’s the last scenario we wish to have.

Let’s imagine a group of children, who are being held together at the same detention facility in Iraq or Syria, coming from similar cultures or backgrounds, and speaking the same or similar language; how would they feel towards their countries of origin, if those countries lock them behind and throw the key? Regardless of whether if they will go through a rehabilitation process or not! Angry maybe? Developing a need to revenge? Or maybe to punish those countries or the citizens of those countries?


From this standpoint, relevant institutions in Europe and particularly in Balkans, must treat the Cubs of the Caliphate as a special case and with the help of NGOs and relevant civic societies, to develop special programs dedicated in a tailor-made fashion to the rehabilitation and reintegration of those children.

Case studies in the Middle East[3], indicated that traditional DDR programs are likely to be inadequate for children. If we take children who have been indoctrinated by extreme religious or political beliefs, and apply such programs on them, we will notice that traditional programs focus on immediate physical health needs but are too short to address the psychosocial aspect, not to mention the deradicalization component. Such programs were originally developed to rehabilitate adult soldiers and not children.

Despite the global interest in fighting violent extremism in the past two decades, only few efforts focused on the deradicalization process itself. Understanding how terrorist recruiters exploit children’s vulnerabilities is a very important factor in the development of effective deradicalization programs that can guarantee a safe and successful rehabilitation process. Prevention, raising public awareness, information exchange and transfer of know-how are the key in fighting terrorism and violence and the only path towards a successful reintegration.

[1] Sara, Mohamed. 2016. “Cubs of the Caliphate: The Islamic State Focus on Children”, International Center for Political Violence and Terrorism Research – Children Recruitment Impact.

[2] Benotman, Noman & Malik, Nikita. 2016. “The Children of Islamic State,” Quilliam Foundation.

[3] Benotman, Noman & Malik, Nikita. 2016. “The Children of Islamic State,” Quilliam Foundation.

Related Post

Truth is the best medicine – Countering Russian propaganda in MacedoniaTruth is the best medicine – Countering Russian propaganda in Macedonia

Aleksandar Nacev

Since 1989, one of the constant goals of Russian foreign policy has been to abolish — or at least weaken — the inner cohesion of existing trans-Atlantic and European institutions, such as NATO and the European Union, as well as the influence of the United States in Europe. In recent years, the Western Balkans have emerged as a front in Russia’s geopolitical confrontation with the West. Building on close historical ties, Moscow is taking advantage of political and economic difficulties to expand its influence, potentially undermining the region’s stability

Since the 1990s, the Western Balkan countries have dealt with internal vulnerabilities and experienced external influence from state and nonstate actors. These sources of instability have made the region more vulnerable and susceptible to external influence from Russia. Internal vulnerabilities such as the rise of nationalism, historical grievances, corruption, weakened state institutions and media, and unemployment have left these countries unstable, enabling state and nonstate actors to influence them. The Western Balkans are likely to become a significant playing field for the competition between Russia and the West. Russia has played a spoiler role by using information and political, economic and military tools to discredit Western institutions — including NATO and the EU — and the foundations of Western democracy, and to strategically project and alter elements of power in Western Balkan countries. Russia has chosen to intervene in the region by aligning with different elements and interfering in these countries’ internal affairs. Over the past decade, Russia has sought to play a larger role. The tools used are not new, but the extent of the involvement certainly is. Russia’s tools include not only instruments of soft power, such as cultural, religious and media campaigns, but increasingly, economic intervention. Slowly but surely, Russian state-owned and state-affiliated businesses are taking possession of key sectors of Balkan economies, transforming Russia into a significant power in the region.