Center for Security Research Articles Cyber Espionage and its Impacts

Cyber Espionage and its Impacts

Blagoja Janakievski

In the newest operational warfare domain, cyberspace, there are armies of nefarious hackers from around the globe who use cyber warfare for economic, political, or military gain. One aspect of cyber warfare that needs to be looked upon more closely is cyber espionage. Cyber spying is the act of engaging in an attack or series of attacks that let an unauthorized user or users view classified of sensitive material. These attacks are often subtle, amounting to nothing more than an unnoticed bit of code or process running in the background of a mainframe or personal workstation, and the target is usually a corporate or government entity. The goal is typically to acquire intellectual property or government secrets. Attacks can be motivated by greed or profit, and can be used in conjunction with a military operation or as an act of terrorism. Consequences can range from loss of competitive advantage to loss of materials, data, infrastructure, or loss of life.

Headlines about cyber espionage usually focus on China, Russia, North Korea, and the United States, whether as the attacking state or the victim of attack. However, the truth is that it is to be expected that most of the world’s developed countries are using cyber espionage units. These state-based threat actor teams are comprised of computer programmers, engineers, and scientists that form military and intelligence agency hacking clusters. They have tremendous financial backing and unlimited technological resources that help them evolve their techniques rapidly. I will briefly mention several cyber-espionage incidents, which will make you believe in the colossal capabilities of cyber warfare.

  1. Chinese Hacking Group’s Cyber-Espionage Campaign – Symantec revealed in June 2018 that a group of Chinese-linked hackers was targeting two United States-based satellite firms. Other than that, the sophisticated hacking group also targeted defense contractors and telecommunications companies in the United States and Southeast Asia. The efforts of the group were believed to be carried out in the interest of the nation. The primary drive for this cyber-espionage campaign was to intercept the military and civilian communications of the victim nations. Hacking with the purpose to intercept is rare but it exists. But in this case, the hacking group deliberately infected the systems controlling the satellites. The motive of their act was to change the positions of the orbiting devices and disrupt data traffic
  2. Vietnamese Campaign Against ASEAN 2017 An APT group, APT32 (also known as OceanLotus Group), allegedly linked to the Vietnamese government, started attacking the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as part of its cyber-espionage campaign. The incident response firm Volexity, in 2017, identified and uncovered the widespread mass digital surveillance and the attack campaign of the group. It also targeted the media, human rights, and civil society organizations.
  3. Intensive Cyber-Espionage Campaign of APT28 Against Montenegro’s GovernmentBefore Montenegro joined NATO in 2017, APT28 (also popularly known as “Fancy Bear”), a malicious hacking group linked to the Russian intelligence, actively participated in a cyber-espionage campaign against the Montenegrin government. The campaign depicts Russia’s desire to intrude in the political affairs of foreign nations. Two booby-trapped attachments had been sent to Montenegrin government officials over the email to load a flash exploit framework through a command-and-control infrastructure.
  4. GhostNet – In 2009, Canadian researchers revealed a large spy network called GhostNet that arranged an intrusion into more than one thousand computers in 103 countries. Perpetrators got unauthorized access to the network of the Dalai Lama offices and used it for compromising other computers. Besides, the attacks were also performed on the foreign ministers and embassies of Germany, Pakistan, India, Iran, South Korea, and Thailand. The Chinese government denied any involvement in the attacks.

This kind of examples show that cyber warfare should be taken seriously, and that cyber espionage has deeply impacted modern war and international relations and will likely continue to do so in the future.

Related Post

America’s military still rules the worldAmerica’s military still rules the world

Aleksandar Nacev PhD

Battlefields are constantly evolving, and modern warfare is quickly advancing. In turn, this is causing countries around the world to pump hundreds of billions of dollars into their militaries in the constant race to develop the most advanced training, technology and weaponry. The permanent pressure to have the best armed forces in the world is usually connected to certain geopolitical and geostrategic goals, and military force or the projection of this force is a very important factor in achieving those goals.

But head-to-head comparisons of military strength between countries are extremely hard to come by — which is what makes the Global Firepower annual rankings so noteworthy. Their 2021 Military Strength Rankings draw on more than 55 factors to assign a Power Index score to 139 countries. The ranking assesses the diversity of each country’s weapons and pays particular attention to their available manpower. Geography, logistical capacity, available natural resources, and the size of defines budgets are also considered. The top power index score is 0.0000, which is “realistically unattainable,” according to Global Firepower. The closer a country is to this number, the more powerful its military is. But who are the top five militaries in the world? Let us take a quick glance over the list and the explanation behind the rankings.


Crime and its Profits from the Corona CrisisCrime and its Profits from the Corona Crisis

Tamara Mitkovska

From December until today, we are facing a disease that took the world by surprise. The pandemic caused an economic and social crisis that diverted the attention of the authorities from crime. Police and the military are being used to implement quarantine, many businesses have collapsed and many jobs have been lost. Hospitals have been, and still are, overflooded with patients for whom there is no cure, and those suffering from other diseases have remained almost neglected. This set of circumstances is ideal for the rise of criminal activity around the world.

In the overall situation we are in, we wonder where are the additional activities of the police during the pandemic? Until now, they have included enforcing curfews, as well as conducting state quarantine,compliance with the orders for self-isolation, supporting the staff from public health facilities in establishing contacts with an infected person, specific tasks and responsibilities of border police officers, and so on. It is more than clear that these additional activities carry an additional, but also a very large burden on the already stretched resources. (more…)

When an order endsWhen an order ends

By Alessandro Politi, Director of the NATO Defense College Foundation

This article intends to discuss three points: the quest for a new world order, echoing the one established in 1945, is pointless; what should be done when an existing order cannot be adapted, and how the transition to a different order should be presently governed, taking into account also the new US administration.

The solutions proposed are to: adopt a flexible globalisation model where shared responsibilities and decision-making are realistically rebalanced; to refuse a fragmenting multipolarism; to relaunch global sustainability by redressing social imbalances at home and abroad in order to tackle climate change and to phase out an outdated model of consumerist capitalism. The overarching global priorities are essentially two: ensuring human security vis-à-vis climate change (and attendant pandemics) and favouring shared prosperity, which means the transition to a fairer hybrid economic system where economic policies are fully accountable to the taxpayer.

Will the Biden presidency understand these two strategic priorities? In short, the answer is: in word yes, in deed yo, with a strong tendency towards a no. Political handicaps in Congress and American socio-cultural conditions may significantly limit the President’s concrete choices, reducing complex decisions to a zero-sum game with China and risking an economic stalemate that could turn into hot confrontation. (more…)